Regional Industry & News

Kansas voters rejected a Republican-backed constitutional amendment Tuesday that would have shifted the state to directly electing Supreme Court justices, delivering a decisive defeat to a measure GOP lawmakers had pursued after the court ruled against the party on abortion and school funding.

About 62% of Kansans voted "no" on the amendment, with 593,695 votes counted as of 11:15 p.m. Tuesday, according to the Kansas Reflector. The Republican-controlled Legislature had referred the amendment to the primary ballot after the state Supreme Court issued rulings the party opposed. The measure would have replaced a 68-year-old system in which a nominating commission selects justices for the governor to appoint, a system created after an earlier era of scandal when justices were directly elected and the governor held total control over selecting replacements.

Opponents argued the change would let campaign donations and partisan politics warp the court's independence, with direct implications for abortion access and school funding rulings. Emily Wales, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Plains Votes, said the result echoed a 2022 vote in which Kansans overwhelmingly chose to protect abortion rights in the state constitution. "We believed Kansans four years ago when they voted overwhelmingly to protect abortion rights in the state constitution," Wales said. "Perhaps now the legislature will believe them, too." Sherri Schwanz, president of a major state teachers' union, praised educators who mobilized against the measure, saying she was "incredibly proud" of their efforts "to defend our schools, our rights, and our Constitution." Former Kansas Supreme Court Chief Justice Lawton Nuss had warned before the vote that judicial candidates could become beholden to political donors under an elected system. "They expect something from their investment," Nuss said. "That compromises the integrity of the court." Retired Justice Carol Beier called Tuesday's result "beyond gratifying," saying, "The Kansas Supreme Court must remain fair and impartial for every citizen. It cannot and will not be bought to give a few an unfair advantage."

Supporters of the amendment argued it would have given Kansans direct input into who interprets the state constitution, criticizing the current nominating commission for concentrating influence among attorneys rather than voters. A television ad from the campaign's largest pro-amendment funder, Kansans for Democracy Inc., argued the existing system let "elites" decide "who's on the Kansas Supreme Court, behind closed doors, trading favors, rewarding friends." Kansas Republican Party chair Danedri Herbert had called the vote "the most important election of our lifetime" ahead of Tuesday's results. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, voters in 21 states directly elect their supreme court justices, a structure supporters said Kansas should adopt.

That the measure failed by a nearly two-to-one margin, despite Kansas Republicans controlling the Legislature that placed it on the ballot, suggests the 2022 abortion-rights vote continues to shape how Kansas voters respond to any measure perceived as a pathway to overturning that outcome, even when framed around a separate question of judicial selection. The strong mobilization from both Planned Parenthood-aligned groups and the state's teachers' union indicates opponents successfully connected an ostensibly procedural question about how judges are chosen to the substantive rulings those judges had already issued on abortion and school funding, a framing that appears to have resonated more broadly than the amendment's direct-democracy argument. The scale of the defeat may complicate future Republican-led efforts in Kansas to alter the judicial selection process through the ballot box, given the amendment needed only a simple legislative majority to reach voters but fell well short of majority support among the electorate itself.

Attention going forward is likely to center on whether Kansas Republicans pursue any alternative approach to reshaping the state judiciary following the amendment's defeat. Continued monitoring of the state Supreme Court's pending caseload on abortion and school funding issues, along with any legislative response to Tuesday's result, is expected to remain a relevant thread in Kansas politics in the coming months.